{"id":893,"date":"2015-08-12T04:30:00","date_gmt":"2015-08-12T08:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cancerawarenessnews.com\/?p=893"},"modified":"2015-10-19T14:50:45","modified_gmt":"2015-10-19T18:50:45","slug":"government-plan-to-only-reduce-fluoridation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/cancerawarenessnews.com\/government-plan-to-only-reduce-fluoridation\/","title":{"rendered":"Americans waking up The Government plan to reduce Fluoridation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Reduction? What about stopping it all together? Fluordation is incredibly harmful and there should be further research explaining the dangers of it.<\/h3>\n

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency<\/strong> are recommending<\/a> changing for the first time in nearly 50 years the amount of fluoride allowed in drinking water because of an increase in fluorosi<\/strong>s \u2014 a condition that causes spotting and streaking on children\u2019s teeth.<\/p>\n

\"\"

The government is proposing that the recommended amount of fluoride in drinking water be set at 0.7 milligrams per liter of water. The recommended range has been 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter since 1962. The EPA<\/strong> will determine whether the maximum amount of fluoride allowed in water will also be lowered.
\nFluoride was first added to water in the United States in the 1940s to help prevent tooth decay<\/a> in children 8 years and under.<\/p>\n

“One of water fluoridation’s biggest advantages is that it benefits all residents of a community — at home, work, school or play,” said Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Howard Koh. “And fluoridation’s effectiveness in preventing tooth decay is not limited to children, but extends throughout life, resulting in improved oral health.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Connett provides a detail run down of the many health problems caused by fluoride consumption, including dental fluorosis, which the Centers For Disease Control just recently announced was a problem for 41 per cent of children aged 12-15 in the United States, clearly indicating that children are being over-exposed to fluoride and that this is affecting other tissues and organs in the body, including bone disorders, a problem also wreaking havoc amongst adults in the United States as one in three now suffer from arthritis, which again is being caused by a build-up of toxic fluoride in the body. Connett also points to fluoride\u2019s connection with thyroid disorders.<\/p>\n

Fresh food that lasts from eFoodsDirect (AD)<\/strong><\/h3>\n

There have now been over 100 studies involving animals which show that fluoride damages the brain, stresses Connett, which is a particular concern for newborn babies who are susceptible to fluoride build up because of their weak blood-brain barrier. Connett cites numerous studies which prove a link between moderate exposure to fluoride and lowered IQ in children.<\/p>\n

Fluoride\u2019s<\/strong> impact on the pineal gland, which is a piece of brain tissue that sits in-between the two hemispheres of the brain, is key because fluoride attracts to this gland like a magnet<\/strong>. Researchers have found through animal studies that fluoride lowers the ability of the pineal gland to produce the hormone melatonin, which in turn shortens the time it takes to reach puberty<\/strong>, correlating with studies of fluoridated communities that show girls are on average menstruating 5 months earlier than those in non-fluoridated communities. Children are entering puberty at increasingly early stages and this is causing widespread concern, but health authorities have made no effort whatsoever to conduct any studies regarding this development and its link to fluoride.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Health authorities in western countries, particularly the United States, are deliberately covering-up the deadly threat posed by fluoride by refusing to conduct any studies into its impact on health, as Connett explains. They have chosen to protect the sanctity of the method of mass fluoridation over and above protecting the health of babies and children. Connett emphasizes the fact that there is virtually no difference in the health of teeth between people in fluoridated<\/strong> areas and non-fluoridated areas, proving that there are no health benefits at all that can be achieved through fluoridating the water supply.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Paul Connett underscores how out of control health authorities in the United States have become, putting out studies that claim injecting mercury into a baby\u2019s bloodstream through vaccines is perfectly safe and good for babies\u2019 brains, while regulating mercury emissions in every other field because it is highly toxic. They have taken a similar approach in the fluoride<\/strong> debate, issuing studies that claim sodium fluoride, a toxic waste which has been heavily regulated in the industrial sphere for decades, has many beneficial health<\/a> advantages when ingested into the human body. This is fostering widespread distrust in government health agencies<\/strong> because scientists involved with them are overseeing a \u201csickening\u201d <\/em>cover-up of the fluoride<\/strong> issue, states Connett.<\/p>\n

This is a highly detailed and in-depth one hour study of the case against fluoride<\/strong> and it demolishes the notion that fluoride<\/strong> has any rightful place in our public water supply.<\/p>\n