, radiotherapy, diagnostic procedures and surgeries.<\/span><\/p>\nThe typical cancer patient spends $50,000 fighting the disease. Chemotherapy drugs are among the most expensive of all treatments, many ranging from $3,000 to $7,000 for a one-month supply.<\/span><\/p>\nIf the cancer industry allows a cure, then their patient base goes away. It makes more sense to keep a steady stream of cancer patients<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>alive,<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/em>but sick and coming back for more. How did this societal monster come about?<\/span><\/p>\nThe featured documentary is enormously informative. It details how the pharmaceutical industry partnered with the American Medical Association (AMA) in an ingenious plan to overtake the medical system in four swift, easy steps, back in the early 1900s. In a nutshell, it went something like this:<\/span><\/p>\n\n- International bankers that own the drug and chemical companies gained control over the medical education system over 100 years ago.<\/span><\/li>\n
- They gave grants to the AMA and leading medical schools in exchange for seats on their board and the ability to control policy.<\/span><\/li>\n
- Finally, they cleverly engineered their control of virtually every federal regulatory agency relating to the practice of medicine.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Imagine a commercial plane crashed and there were some fatalities involved. You can be sure that would make the headline of every major newspaper. Well, we have the equivalent of 8-10 planes crashing EVERY DAY with everyone on board dying from cancer.<\/span><\/p>\nNearly two million Americans are diagnosed with cancer every year\u2014one person out of three will be hit with a cancer diagnosis at some time in their lives, in spite of the massive technological advances over the past half-century.<\/span><\/p>\nWestern medicine is no closer to finding a “cancer cure,” while cancer has grown into a worldwide epidemic of staggering proportions. The statistics speak for themselves:<\/span><\/p>\nIn the early 1900s, one in 20 people developed cancer<\/span><\/p>\nIn the 1940s, one in 16 people developed cancer<\/span><\/p>\nIn the 1970s, it was one in 10<\/span><\/p>\nToday, it’s one in three!<\/span><\/p>\nAccording to the CDC, about 1,660,290 (1.66 million) new cancer cases are expected to be diagnosed in 20131. If overall death rates are falling, why are incidence rates still on the rise? The answer is simple: the 40-year “war on cancer” has been a farce.<\/span><\/p>\nJust in case you “doubters” and skeptics want some concrete proof, some evidence to take with you on your journey NOT to get cancer, here are some historical, proven facts to help you understand WHY you need to go 100% organic and research and use natural remedies, to build your immunity to disease with superfoods, herbs, tinctures and organic supplements.<\/span><\/p>\nPay it forward 100 years<\/h1>\n
Nearly 100 years ago, the AMA began removing nutritional education from medical schools in America. Medical doctors would no longer understand anything about using food as medicine (or be allowed to suggest it), and all mid-wives, Native American herbalists and natural healers would be referred to in medical journals as “quacks.” The Western Medicine philosophy would soon come to be that no food in the world could ever heal a human being or cure any disease or disorder; in fact, only pharmaceuticals and vaccines would ever be able to make that claim (legally) and get away with it, whether in peer reviews, medical and science journals (JAMA), scientific “studies” or labeled as such on products.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nTerminology Clarification: When we use a term like \u201c3% cure rate\u201d we are talking about the percent of cancer patients who live for 5 years after diagnosis. The reference to 5 years is the standard of comparison. However, medical doctors frequently use a \u201csix-month\u201d cure rate statistic in order to make their treatments look far more effective than they really are. But we always use a 5-year cure rate statistic.<\/span><\/p>\nHow is it possible to have a 90% cure rate? You use cancer treatments that do not damage healthy cells because they target cancer cells and either gently kill the cancer cells or revert them into normal cells. Because they do not damage healthy cells these treatments can be used in very high doses!! Plus in many cases several of these types of treatments can be combined together for synergy!!<\/span><\/p>\nThe key phrase is: very high doses. The treatments with 3% cure rates must be used in very low doses because they do not target cancer cells and thus they would kill the patient if they were used in high doses. Well, they kill the patient anyway because they are used in low doses and even in low doses they kill more healthy cells than cancer cells.<\/span><\/p>\nSo why would anyone in their right mind use the cancer treatments with 3% cure rates? Because they don\u2019t know about the treatments with 90% cure rates!!!\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
![\"forbidden_cures2\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cancerawarenessnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/forbidden_cures2.png\")